Review queue & quality
What lands in Review, and how Mavera keeps itself honest.
Work the Review queue
Inspect the proposed change, diff, evidence, decision, and audit trail.
Choose Review from the sidebar.
Good afternoon
Choose a surface from the sidebar to begin.
- 1Open ReviewChoose Review from the sidebar.
- 2Open a proposalOpen the first simulated review item.
- 3Compare current and proposedInspect the exact field-level change.
- 4Open evidenceRead the source and confidence behind the proposal.
- 5Make the decisionApprove or reject the local-only change.
- 6Read the audit trailOpen the resulting audit entry.
The Review queue
Some outputs want a human before they become "the record" — document updates proposed from research findings, mostly. They land in Review (left sidebar, with a count badge).
Click any item to see exactly what's proposed: the current text and the proposed text side by side, plus the evidence behind the change and its grounding strength. Approve or dismiss — nothing changes without you.
How Mavera stays honest (the short version)
- Numbers are computed, never generated. When you see "62% preferred Variant A," code counted 62% of actual synthetic responses. The model writes words; arithmetic comes from arithmetic.
- Everything carries provenance.
grounded→ built from your real data.category-modeled→ built from category knowledge.estimate→ labeled guess. The badge travels with the result everywhere it goes. - Refusal over invention. Audiences decline questions outside their profile. Mave says "I don't have data for that" instead of manufacturing an answer.
- Web claims cite sources. Programs and audits link every external claim to where it came from.
When a number looks off
Click into the run (My Research → the item) — the transcript shows every step, what was asked, what came back, and how the number was computed. If something's still wrong, the conversation is the interface: tell Mave, she'll re-run it.